July 16th, 2008
I go back and forth on this issue. I’m generally skeptical, but every once in a while I come across something that looks like real evidence. Recent radar reports requested under the Freedom of Information Act might qualify.
What’s hard about this stuff, assuming there is anything to any of it in the first place, is that there are a lot of crazy and unbalanced people attracted to the UFO community who are full of crap. It seems that any topic outside of the mainstream tends to be more open (hello, sf fans) and more willing to take in the fringe folk. Then when you have the opportunity to visit with community members, the well balanced who may have insight into something a little weird going on get swamped out by the loonies.
I don’t think we know everything going on in and above the world. I want to know, but fringe communities don’t have quality control over information the way we do in science (which is also imperfect, although much less so).
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The problem with the radar report is that like basically ALL the more “credible” reports, it still has lots of crap mixed in. For instance, a size of 500 to 1000 feet? How do they know? Traffic control radars aren’t imaging radars, basically all you get is a strength of signal for “size”, totally dependent on the rcs….Sounds as though, if it was real at all, that it could well be a test of a “secret” plane (the SR-71 AND Mig 25 can both go faster, for example, though neither can slow to 50 mph without falling out of the sky…..). That explanation is obviously much more likely than ETs (which isn’t to say it isn’t very, very interesting, if true).
Yeah, the best-documented UFO sightings in the past have seemed consistent with secret experimental aircraft.