October 24th, 2008
Buzz Aldrin is at it again.
He’s making the case that we should send people to Mars, but not bring them home. He thinks we should go into space for good, for real, for the duration. Well, maybe they could return at retirement age if it’s feasible by then.
I am sympathetic to this idea. With Apollo, we went to the moon a few times, and then that was it. We haven’t sent people out of Earth orbit since then. The moon race was a cold war stunt. With the Chinese and the Indians getting into space recently, we could see another race and more stunts, but stunts do not constitute a long-term program working toward serious long-term goals.
I have no doubt that there would be highly qualified volunteers to go live on Mars. That would be a cool thing to do, and many people have the correct temperament to do so. There are great risks about whether we could in fact do it successfully.
Stephen Hawking is in favor of space exploration with the long-term goal of getting our eggs out of a single basket. He’s worried that something could occur to wipe us out on Earth — asteroid, biowarfare, something else. I think he’s right, but I don’t know that we have the will yet to put the resources into colonizing Mars in any serious way. The economic crisis right in particular probably makes a lot of people see a manned Mars mission of any kind as an expensive waste of money.
What do you think?
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Earth doesn’t suck, but I’d go.
Fair enough! I don’t think it sucks either, on the whole, most of the time.
I’m with Steve-Earth is fine-but don’t get between me and the spaceport!
I have cried real tears over the fact that we are not bursting out of the Solar System in seven different directions. My 10 year old self thought I was going to be living on the Lunar Colony by the age I am now.
How depressing. I’m going to go pound about three
generous shots of ouzo & cheer up. Great blog, Mike!!