I'm kind of amazed with Orson Scott Card for proclaiming that it's better to endorse competing, inconsistent religious viewpoints over atheists. I mean, COME ON. Isn't this lacking intellectually integrity? If you really believe in a particular faith, without evidence, completely, how is anything different from this belief of fundamentally different validity??? I think Card isn't very trustworthy on this point. I'm disappointed. Card, please tell us what to believe! Or at least the hierarchy of belief so we know what is better to believe than what. And who and what people should we hate?! Please, quick, because we apparently don't know!